Gaming Performance

As usual, gaming performance was tested with a variety of current games. We ran our benchmarks at a 1280x1024 resolution with high quality settings

Battlefield 2

This benchmark is performed using DICE's built-in demo playback functionality with additional capture capabilities designed in house. During the benchmark, the camera switches between players and vehicles in order to capture the most action possible. There is a significant amount of smoke, explosions, and vehicle usage as this a very GPU intensive Battlefield 2 benchmark. We run Battlefield 2 using medium quality graphics settings available in the video settings. The game itself is best experienced with average in-game frame rates of 35 and up.

Gaming Performance - Battlefield 2

Company of Heroes

Company of Heroes was released last year and is still proving to be a very addictive RTS game around the office. The game is extremely GPU intensive and also requires a hefty CPU at times. The game contains a built-in performance test that utilizes the game engine to generate several different action scenes. We find the performance test gives a good indication of how well your system will perform throughout the game on average. Some of the in-game action sequences can be more demanding than the performance test, however, and we are working on a repeatable game play benchmark. For now, we find the game to be enjoyable with an average frame rate score in the performance test above 35fps.

Gaming Performance - Company of Heroes

Prey

Prey offers some superb action sequences, unique weapons and characters, and is a visually stunning game at times. It still requires a very good GPU to run it with all of the eye candy turned on. We set all graphic settings to their maximum except for AA/AF and utilize a custom timedemo that takes place during one of the more action oriented sequences. We generally find the game to be enjoyable with an average frame rate above 35fps.

Gaming Performance - Prey

Supreme Commander

Supreme Commander is one of the favorite real time strategy games around the office as it continues to provide a great deal of replay value and the graphics are very good once the eye candy is turned on. What we especially like about the game is the fact that it can bring the best system to its knees and that fact makes it a great system benchmark. This particular game requires both a very good CPU and GPU when playing the game at anything above 1024x768 with decent settings. We utilize the game's built-in benchmark and generally find the game to be enjoyable with an average frame rate above 25fps.

Gaming Performance - Supreme Commander

Gaming Summary

The Foxconn MARS board performed admirably in the game tests although in the bandwidth sensitive Prey test it placed near the bottom of the group. Overall, the board continues its pattern of finishing in the middle of the pack. Considering the group of boards in the test group, this is actually an accomplishment for Foxconn.

Audio, Compression, and 3D Rendering Performance Disk Controller Performance
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Griswold - Sunday, September 23, 2007 - link

    I see they also implemented the Northbridge<->PWM section cooling with heatpipes. Recipe for hot PWM with an Overclocked 4 core CPU

    Humbug. The PWMs with an overclocked quad will be hotter than a P35 NB - and they also can take alot more heat than a NB. Dont make issues up where there are none.
  • kmmatney - Saturday, September 22, 2007 - link

    it seems like it would be better just to remove the covers over chipset heatsinks - don't they just reduce airflow? The coolpipe logo piece should just be taken off altogether.
  • wolfman3k5 - Saturday, September 22, 2007 - link

    Nice review, thanks allot! I want to buy one of these, where can I find this board?
  • JarredWalton - Saturday, September 22, 2007 - link

    Not out at retail quite yet - early next month I believe.
  • cmdrdredd - Saturday, September 22, 2007 - link

    Good board from the review, but it's a little late. Those who were looking to adopt P35 already have one of the other boards, everyone else wants to see X38. I suppose it would depend on the price of this board vs others once it hits actual retail channels.
  • Griswold - Sunday, September 23, 2007 - link

    Your world must be really small.
  • strikeback03 - Monday, September 24, 2007 - link

    Then again, didn't Gary Key say in the comments on the ASUS X38 board that he expects X38 to take over this market segment once initial hysteria wears off; as performance should be better than P35 for the same money. Then P35 would primarily work in the midrange.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now