Media Encoding Performance

We are utilizing an updated video encoding test suite for this article that includes AnyDVD, Nero Recode 2, Windows Media Encoder 9, and QuickTime Pro 7.1.

Our first encoding test is quite easy - we take our original Office Space DVD and use AnyDVD Ripper to copy the full DVD to the hard drive without compression, thus providing an almost exact duplicate of the DVD. We then fire up Nero Recode 2, select our Office Space copy on the hard drive, and perform a shrink operation to allow the entire movie along with extras to fit on a single 4.5GB DVD disc. We leave all options on their defaults except we turn off the advanced analysis option. The scores reported include the full encoding process and are represented in seconds, with lower numbers indicating better performance.

Media Encoding Performance - Nero Recode 2

Media Encoding Performance - Nero Recode 2

The AnyDVD Rip results do not show our DDR3 boards performing well against the DDR2 boards, especially against the same chipset. Even though memory timings are higher, the increased bandwidth and latency would normally bring the DDR3 boards within range of the DDR2 boards in a test that is CPU throughput and disk intensive. The 3% performance deficit is unusual, indicating that the high volume of data being transferred may cause memory latencies to be a more significant factor. The Shrink results are more in alignment with the DDR3 boards showing up to a 2% difference in this test.

Our next test has us converting our day at the beach AVI file into a high definition WMV file suitable for our Grandparents to view on their new HDTV. We ensured our quality settings were set to High Definition. The balance of options is set to standard settings and then we let this program do its magic. We are reporting the numbers in seconds to complete the conversion.

Media Encoding Performance - Windows Media Encoder

We see the boards with the best memory bandwidth and latency performance once again leading in a test that still favors the DDR2 boards. Our DDR3 boards finish in the middle of the pack. The overall difference in scores between all boards is a rather small 1.3%.

Next on the list is our QuickTime Pro 7.1 test that will convert our newly downloaded .MOV file into a plasma screen pleasing H.264 format. We ensured our quality settings were set to their highest levels and then let the horses loose. The values reported are in seconds for the conversion time, with lower numbers being better.

Media Encoding Performance - Quicktime Pro 7.1

The DDR3-1333 platforms have a slight advantage in this test although the differences are truly minimal. Outside of the MSI board, all of the P35 boards are scoring slightly faster than the older chipsets, and the total range of scores differs by 3.5%.

Futuremark Benchmarks Audio and Multimedia Performance
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • yzkbug - Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - link

    Will we ever see boards supporting both DDR2 and DDR3 memory? It would be nice to be able to run DDR2 for now, and switch to DDR3 in the future without buying a new mobo.
  • Stele - Friday, June 1, 2007 - link

    There's already at least one in existence - the Asus P5KC. Check it out http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=3&l2=11&a...">here.

    It would be interesting if Anandtech could get hold of this board and see if having support for both memory types sacrifices fine tuning and hence performance/overclocking capability by a measurable degree.
  • slayerized - Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - link

    I know it is a bit premature, but do you have n estimate on the targeted price points for these boards and ddr3 memory modules?
  • gigahertz20 - Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - link

    You can already buy the Asus P5K Deluxe for $225 from here.

    http://www.xpcgear.com/p5kdeluxe.html">http://www.xpcgear.com/p5kdeluxe.html

    My guess is once Newegg and some other places get them in hopefully around $200 or below but maybe not. They will be expensive at first.
  • xsilver - Thursday, May 31, 2007 - link

    are p35 boards recommended for midrange overclocking systems just yet?
    a gigabyte ds3 + e6320 vs. a asus p5k + e4400 combo; which system is likly to have better performance after OC?
  • Sunrise089 - Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - link

    The above comments reminded me of something many reviews have said recently - that "additional airflow needed to OC" line. What exactly does that mean? Does it simply mean airflow inside the case, as in you first tested with so case fans at all, and had to add some? Or does it mean you added some sort of motherboard specific additional cooling? If the latter, a motherboard that does not require such an added part would be much more appealing.
  • Googer - Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - link

    Good Article. But where are the disk and I/O benchmarks?
  • Treripica - Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - link

    What the hell is a niggle?
  • johnsonx - Thursday, May 31, 2007 - link

    a 'niggle' is a minor complaint, or perhaps a complaint about a small detail. It's completely unrelated to another word like that with an 'r' at the end.
  • TallBill - Wednesday, May 30, 2007 - link

    All applications were run with administer privileges.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now